Adolescent Relationship Cynthia Wilson Moore (1997) mentioned the brand new accessory form of a hundred 14-15 -year-olds having fun with a job interview procedure and you will requested a close friend from for each and every teenager so you’re able to price the behaviour for social acceptability. Just what Moore found was that secure youngsters were less likely to want to do risky sexual things – eg: non-safe sex – than just its insecure colleagues however, have been more likely to have experienced gender. She concluded using this lookup you to that have a secure attachment particular most useful makes a teenager having entering the field of mature intimate matchmaking. With confident mind-value would permit Red-colored to stand upwards having alone which have a strong interior locus regarding control and you may go into the adult globe a lot more naturally terminology. Having reduced self-admiration can get push an undesirable vMEME harmonic out of Reddish engaging in risky behaviours to get desired to own PURPLE’s belongingness needs.
Once more, though, not totally all research shows continuity. During the an excellent longitudinal investigation Peter Zimmermann et al (2000) reassessed through interview 44 16-year-olds that has originally been through the fresh Uncommon State ranging from a dozen-eighteen months. They discovered that infant attachment types of wasn’t a beneficial predictor out-of accessories in puberty, that have negatively-affecting existence situations seeming for altered secure attachments to help you a keen insecure type.
The fresh scientists wished to see if there is certainly a relationship ranging from the latest little one’s attachment type and their coming method to close relationship
One of the most greatest training into long-term outcomes of infant attachment toward adult dating ‚s the ‘Like Quiz’ because of the Cindy Hazan Phil Shaver ( 1987).